Sara Zampierin

Sara Zampierin (Supporting Kids in Peru - SKIP): Sara was born and raised in California. She graduated from Rice University in Houston, Texas, with a bachelor's degree in mathematical economic analysis, policy studies and managerial studies. During her undergraduate studies, Sara worked with a mentoring program for at-risk elementary students. She also worked with the Center for Capital Assistance, a nonprofit organization that conducts mitigation investigations and assists attorneys who represent people on Death Row. After her fellowship, Sara wrote: "I understand now how much a community-based organization can do with such a close, personal relationship with its members, and with just a little support from organizations like AP they can really spread their message."



Education without corruption

22 Aug

On Monday, I went to have my second meeting with the Defensoria del Pueblo, an organization created by the constitution in 1993 to protect fundamental and constitutional rights and ensure that the government was providing the necessary services to the population. I was very excited, since they had invited me to come along with them to see how they resolve complaints in their new campaign Educación sin Corrupción (Education without Corruption). In the pamphlet and electronic material I was given by their office, it clearly states that charging any fees from the students is illegal (whether it’s for the APAFA, for copies, or for classroom supplies, all of which our students currently pay). I was very curious and excited to see what they were doing to combat this problem.

After visiting three schools and hearing infinite excuses from the directors, teachers, and other administrators and staff on cases of physical abuse, grade withholding, and diplomas which had never been given to students, I still was curious about the fundamental flaw in the government’s execution of their educational charge—that the education was not free as stated in the constitution. I asked the lawyer we were with if she saw many cases dealing with money, and she said that she has never had one. We talked about the fundamental right that these students had and that ultimately it was up to the government to pay for the children’s education, but since they don’t provide enough money to the schools it’s no wonder that the teachers have to charge in order to provide materials to their students. When I asked the lawyer what she thought would happen if parents were to submit complaints about money, she said that there probably wasn’t much their office could do to recoup the money from the government.

SKIP wants to move towards the direction of advocating for quality education for the students, instead of just providing the money and supplies for a limited number of children to attend school. In brainstorming the best way to do this, it’s necessary (but difficult) to understand the politics and the established way of doing things in the Peruvian system, and how to use this information to best to affect change from the government.

The Wall Street Journal recently ran an article about the government’s failures in Peru, especially in the provision of water and education. They talked about private schools as sometimes being the best option, even for the poorest families. In our area of Trujillo, the private schools cost about the same price as the public schools after you factor in all the money the parents pay out of pocket to the teachers and APAFA over the year. Some of SKIP is under the impression that we could make a bigger difference on these kids if we did open our own school. For the same cost per child, we could provide higher quality facilities and education. However, if we exit the public school system is it like giving up on public education and the rest of the children that we can’t accommodate in SKIP?

Posted By Sara Zampierin

Posted Aug 22nd, 2007

1 Comment

  • Marilu Del Carpio

    August 30, 2007

     

    You will be surprised how many laws there are that not enforceable or just ignored. All children should go to school and have an eduction but the government does not have schools in remote areas making it very difficult for children to walk or travel to school – at the same time there is the problem of the Andean culture whereby children have to help in taking care of their animals thus have no time to go to school. What sense does a law of free make when there are no adequate facilities nor resources to provide books and all scholastic material? So far Peruvian governments have always given priority to other things in thee budget at the cost of education. On the other hand you find some private schools at modest cost that can provide a better education than the public system so why can’t the Government do it? I don’t know if you have noticed but there are private schools for every pocket….

Enter your Comment

Submit

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

 

Fellows

2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003