Erica Williams

Erica Williams (WOCON – Women’s Consortium of Nigeria): Erica worked at the Leadership Alliance Summer Research Early Identification Program at Howard University, in Washington, where she organized material for the African Burial Ground Project. Between 1999 and 2001 Erica worked and studied in Venezuela, Brazil and South Africa. In South Africa, she conducted historical and ethnographic research at the University of Western Cape. Erica studied for her BA at New York University, where she received several travel and research scholarships and volunteered for several different organizations: Students Active for Ending Rape (SAFER), WomenCare, Face to Face International, The Center for African Spiritual Culture, InI Performance Club, NYU, Golden Rose Awards Banquet Committee, NYU. She also served as Editorial Assistant, Academic Achievement Program Newsletter, NYU. At the time of her fellowship, Erica was studying for a Master's degree in African Studies at Yale University and preparing to start a Ph.D. in Cultural and Social Anthropology at Stanford University. Erica asked many probing questions of AP’s new fellowship program, in person and through her final evaluation: “At the orientation, I noticed the beginning of a possible conflict of interest when I learned that interns were expected to engage in capacity-building at their organizations. But I questioned my ability as a 23 year-old student to tell a 50 year-old experienced, renowned human rights lawyer and activist how to run her organization. Perhaps this is the cultural anthropologist in me, but AP, myself, and future interns must recognize their position as outsiders to Nigeria and to WOCON. Being in that tenuous position creates a dynamic where it is difficult to tell people what they should do, because as outsiders we’re not even accustomed to living in their environment." “For instance, with my office experience in the U.S., I’m used to organizing files in labeled manila folders and hanging file folders in file cabinets. Thus, I found WOCON’s filing system of long folders in a multi-shelved closet impossible to understand. But it works for them. My work experience in the U.S. has also trained me to write out my daily activities, allot a specified amount of time to tasks, and rely heavily on the computer. This is an unattainable goal in Lagos because of the constant unexpected power outages and the fact that sending two emails can take you upwards of two hours. Future interns should be fully aware of the challenges they will face in Nigeria, and even then they may still have trouble adapting to the environment.” Erica also found Lagos to be hard work: “The daily struggles of life in Lagos were another challenge. Constant power outages, traffic jams, torrential rains and floods, painfully slow internet service, and the week-long fuel strike all conspired to make my work more difficult.”

A Great Way to End Sexism

27 Jun

From June 23 to 27, Mrs. Bisi Olateru-Olagbegi organized a week-long gender sensitization training for judges, lawyers, and magistrates from all over the country in her capacity as the national coordinator for WiLDAF (Women in Law and Development in Africa). The goal of the workshop was to build the target group’s capacity to engage in “judicial activism” and effectively advocate for women’s human rights. The program educated the participants on women’s rights issues, violence against women, and international instruments that guarantee women’s human rights such as CEDAW (The Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.

The workshop was innovative and exceptional because it didn’t fall into the usual trap of “preaching to the converted” by reaching out to people with an interest in women’s rights issues. Rather, WiLDAF hand-selected participants who were directors of organizations or leaders in their communities because of their ability to influence others with their newfound gender sensitivity. WiLDAF gave the participants ten copies each of different brochures to distribute to their colleagues, and required that they submit contact information of at least ten people to whom they would distribute the materials.

The interactive structure of the workshop allowed for maximum participation from everyone present. When discussing discrimination against women, Mrs. Olateru-Olagbegi allowed participants to call out their ideas. This was an excellent opportunity for me, as an outsider, to hear what issues are facing Nigerian women. A few examples of discrimination that women in (some parts of) Nigeria face include a lack of inheritance rights, oppressive widowhood practices, lack of access to political positions (less than 3% of political positions in Nigeria are occupied by women), and discrimination on the job (women are sometimes required to get a letter of consent from their husband before transferring to a job).

Another issue that was raised was that of female genital circumcision. It was stated that 60% of Nigerian women are circumcised. Some of the men said that the practice prevents promiscuity, but Mrs. Olateru-Olagbegi pointed out that three quarters of sex workers are circumcised. She also highlighted the effect of Structural Adjustment Programmes on women, saying that “after SAPs so many men became bread-eaters while women were winning bread all over the place.”

Whenever the men said sexist things, which they often did, the women were quick to correct them. When talking about domestic violence, a few men said that women bring it upon themselves by nagging their husbands when they come home. In discussing rape, there was an argument over whether penetration is a necessary element of rape. According to the legal definition of rape as “unlawful carnal knowledge without consent,” rape does not require penetration. Not satisfied with that conclusion, the men went on to point out how some women dress provocatively, which was immediately shot down by the women who argued that they’re still not asking to be raped, and that men should be able to control themselves.

Marital rape was another controversial topic. The speaker said that in Nigeria, three quarters of women are raped by their husbands the first time they have sexual intercourse. Many of the men refused to believe that marital rape exists. Instead, they argued that upon marriage, husbands gain unlimited sexual access to their wives because of an “implied consent” and the fact that wives no longer own their bodies.

The workshop taught me that sexism is hard to unlearn, but at least people are trying.

Posted By Erica Williams

Posted Jun 27th, 2003

1 Comment

  • Annette Grey

    November 11, 2009


    The violence and evil doings against women, when does it ends? Judges should never advocate violence against women, but in my situation, that is my reality.

    There should be studies and then protective legislation against victims of domestic violence transitioning to overt legal domestic abuse. A judge, who shows patterns in their judgeship to advocate more violence and hardship, should be removed from service. Domestic violence should not transcend to legal domestic abuse. Stop the violence by stopping evil judges.

    I am a mother of five and I live in Tampa, Florida with four of my children. I was with a man for 14 years that abused us without mercy. This narcissist has no conscience, love for self, and others. Even with the blessing of twin babies swelling in my belly that was no deterrent from a right hook across my high cheekbones. Thank God, the premature labor that ensued after did not claim the lives of my precious sons.

    After living with this monster for over a decade, it is not fair the court should help him beat me further. I have been up against this evil and greedy good-old-boy-network in the 13th Judicial Circuit. Why is there no “judicial activism” here in Florida that I am aware of? Who is out there to stop the bleeding and the crushing blows to our economic further?

    My particular case has been very acrimonious and litigious due to long-term domestic violence and a judge who advocates violence against women and children. The judge on my case is bias and clearly suffers from gender bias issues. I petitioned the judge to remove himself from my case. We sighted overt and repeat bias rulings (“he can pay you child support when the house is sold”) and he has refused to do right and create no harm.

    This judge does not hide his bias against me and is very engaging in assisting my abuser in court. I am sick and tired of the river of tears that streams down my cheeks every time I go before this pseudo court of justice.

    I have hit brick walls writing to my governor and other political officials in my state for help.
    I live in one of the most beautiful, astute, courageous, inspirational, brilliant and respected country on this planet Earth and yet there is no rescue for me. Then, why is it, this American woman cannot and is not getting equal access to justice? I know this is not Cuba, because when I look out my window, I see unlimited possibilities for my children. The answer is out there.

    My children and I should not be facing homelessness when we have assets. Why would a judge advocate domestic violence and create hardship for children? Why would America let judges get away with such outrageous practice and serve on the bench?

    What does any American woman like I go for relief? There is clearly a political stigma against me in this town for appealing my case and winning that appeal. How do I get out of this hole, on bended knees, and bow my head in gratitude to God for preserving the basic needs of my children?


    Annette Grey

Enter your Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *