
This photo was taken by AP in 2004 during a visit to a Badi community, when prostitution was still legal
Along the road from Nepalgunj to Tulsipor we stop at a bus stop above the River Rapti to meet Jamuna Badi and her husband Sankar Badi Nepali. Jamuna and Sankar are our introduction to the Badi, one of the few Dalit sub-castes that are well known outside Nepal. The reason is that Badi women practiced prostitution for many centuries and still cannot shake off the stigma. We’d like to hear why from the Badi themselves.
I’ll share more of Jamuna’s story in my next blog but for the moment I want to reflect on one of the defining features of caste – the fact that it leaves people with no option to change. The Badi are a perfect, if poignant, example.
The Badi first came to Nepal from India in the fourteenth century and served as courtesans at principalities and the Royal Court where they danced, sang and provided sex for nobles. This ended in 1951 when the Rana dynasty collapsed. Deprived of royal patronage, Badi women were left to fend for themselves and took up prostitution on a larger scale.
Prostitution was criminalized in 2008 but a government task force the same year found that 6% of all Badi women were still practicing prostitution and almost twenty years later the association still hangs over the Badi like a cloud.
There is still some controversy over whether the prostitution was coerced, and if so how. I noted in my second blog that caste was by definition coercive because it denied people agency, and this is certainly implied when one says that Badi girls were “born into prostitution.” The process is explained in this fascinating 2007 paper by Thomas Cox which describes how Badi girls were readied for prostitution, like child brides:
“Badi girls from early childhood on know and generally accept the fact that a life of prostitution awaits them. Badi girls see all the young women around them and often their own mothers and sisters prostitute themselves on a daily basis. Badi girls also usually do not go to school and have little contact with outsiders. They are thus not exposed to many ideas, values or beliefs that counter those in their own society. Girls also learn early on that prostitution is the only means of support available to most Badi women.”
Prostitution was so deeply entrenched in Badi communities that a girl’s first experience of sexual intercourse was – like marriage – accompanied by a ceremony known as nathiya kholne. Badi girls had their own argot (slang) which allowed them to discuss prostitution with their mothers in the presence of strangers without disclosing business secrets.
This is how a social norm coerces and it resembles other traditional practices encountered by The Advocacy Project through the years. These have included genital cutting in Kenya (FGM), bonded labor in Nepal, the trafficking of women from Nigeria to Italy, and child marriage in Zimbabwe. In each of these cases tradition combined with poverty to further dis-empower vulnerable people, particularly girls. Such practices are so deeply embedded in society that it requires enormous willpower to resist. The younger the victim the more difficult this is and the less likely she will understand, let alone protest.
In some cases, we have found that women who had themselves suffered were among the most zealous advocates. For example, the trafficking of young women from Nigeria to Italy (2000) was managed by “madams” who had themselves been trafficked. We also found that parents were also fierce defenders of FGM in Kenya (2014). This fits with Cox’s description of Badi prostitution in Nepal in 2008. His paper suggests that the main culprits were Badi mothers and grandmothers who prepared their daughters for prostitution and took care of the business side.
Poverty is also relevant to this discussion because it leaves people with few choices. Did prostitution condemn Badi families to poverty? Perhaps. Some girls interviewed by Cox in 2007 charged as little as 30 rupees (21 cents at today’s rate) for a session. Hardly enough to support an entire family.
The impact of prostitution on Badi children offered an even more clear-cut example of coercion. Clients of Badi prostitutes would refuse to give their names or accept responsibility if they fathered a child, which happened often. As a result, the children remained stateless because citizenship was patrilineal (handed down through fathers).
This was pure coercion because the children had no say in the matter, and it spelled the beginning of the end for Badi prostitution. In 2005 The Supreme Court of Nepal passed a landmark decision granting citizenship to Badi children. When the government dragged its feet, over 500 enraged Badi mothers descended on Kathmandu and partially undressed in the center of the city. Lawmakers were scandalized and no doubt embarrassed (because some had fathered Badi children). The world also took notice and a law was passed in 2007. The same year, prostitution was also outlawed.
Of course, not every individual act of Badi prostitution was involuntary. Some feminists would also say that women should be free to choose their own profession, however unsavory it might appear. Some literature even suggests that prostitution in Nepal gave Badi women agency and turned them into the family breadwinners. As recently as June 2021 some Badi women in the mid-west even demanded a license to practice sex-work, to ensure their livelihood.
All of this is fascinating, but for now I’m happy to go with the prevailing theory that Badi women were trapped into centuries of prostitution by the social norm. Judging from this first meeting, many Badi remain trapped by the stigma.
More reading:
The Badi: Prostitution as a social norm among an untouchable caste of West Nepal by Thomas Cox Orchid Press, Hong Kong, 2007.
The Badi Community of Nepal, UN Field Bulletin, December 2012
Poverty Forces “Untouchable” Women to Prostitution by Anju Gautam Yogi, Global Press Journal 2012
Next: A Badi Family Remembers
Posted By Iain Guest
Posted Nov 12th, 2024


2 Comments
Laila Azmy
April 1, 2025
While I most certainly agree that the caste system has imposed huge structural restrictions on the economic, social, and political autonomy of subordinated caste groups, I would venture to take a more critical approach in regards to this specific topic of Badi prostitution. It goes without saying that Badi people have been crowded into a stigmatized and under regulated (if at all) sector of the labor market due to structures of power outside of their control. However, I would not necessarily say that they are denied agency or coerced into prostitution just by virtue of this fact. I’m taking a class right now on this very subject, called Sex Work and Sex Trafficking, and we recently watched a documentary titled “Tales of the Night Fairies.” The film followed a health professional shadowing a sex worker advocacy group (DMSC) in West Bengal, India and observing the ways in which they navigate complex local/global economic circuits while demanding dignity as workers. The group organized a sex worker carnival, where they performed dances and plays, to raise awareness about their community. They sent out teams of outreach volunteers to speak to other sex workers about STIs and safer sex practices. In short, they utilize their own peer networks to organize for labor rights, health and safety, and respect from their broader society. This reminds me a bit of what you mentioned here, with the Badi women protesting at the state capitol. Despite historical and enduring subjugation, they are workers who demand to be seen and acknowledged by their state. That sounds like agency to me, and a powerful showing of it, too. I’d be interested to learn more about the diversity of experiences in prostitution from Badi women. No doubt it can be a dangerous profession, with risk of violence from clients and community members alike, health concerns, and pricing fluctuation. But, are there other viable avenues for Badi women’s employment? At least they are making some money. I’m also sure that many Badi women do not see this profession as coercive, but just as a means to an end. Is it fair to impose judgement on mothers and grandmothers in the community as “culprits” of trafficking, when larger socio-historical systems of oppression are at play here? I doubt that they see it as doing something wrong, but simply providing a means for some income generation. It seems that a better regulated industry that recognizes these women for their labor and guarantees them some rights as workers is a necessary step towards improving the outlook for Badi livelihood overall.
Emma Cohen
April 8, 2025
I think Laila raises some interesting points and I want to expand on her suggestion that regulating the industry and guaranteeing these women rights as workers is an important focus. Like Laila acknowledges, prostitution can be a dangerous profession. Assuming that these risks are inherent to the work and outlawing it as a result might be much less effective than de-stigmatizing prostitution and increasing protections for sex workers. I recently read an interesting piece related to this within in the US context — Chanelle Gallant’s chapter in Beyond Survival titled “When your money counts on it: Sex work and transformative justice.” It discusses how due to the stigmatization and criminalization of sex work in the US, sex workers cannot turn to the state for safety. As a result, they have developed their own alternative systems for keeping each other safe. There is quite a bit of agency in this, similar to the agency of DMSC in West Bengal and Badi women protesting at the state capital, using their own argot/slang to share business information, and demanding a license to practice sex work. That all not to say that we should ignore the elements of coercion on this issue, but rather to, like Laila suggests, take a more complex approach. I wonder if while simultaneously exposing and challenging the systems which underlie the issue it is possible and worthwhile to investigate the conditions and risks Badi women face in doing this work, what their demands are, and what practices they’ve developed to organize their own safety as well as advocate for better protections for them.