Jackie K. (India)

Jackie K. (Chintan Environmental research and Action Group): Jackie grew up on the Canadian prairies in Winnipeg, Manitoba where she became deeply interested in the impact of environmental change on marginalized peoples. She graduated in 2007 from the University of Manitoba with a Bachelor of Environmental Science (First Class Honours) and a University Gold Medal as the highest achieving graduate in her faculty. While completing this degree, Jackie worked in the University of Manitoba’s Environmental Conservation Lab, helping research on the social impacts of mad cow disease and other ecological challenges. In the fall of 2007, Jackie began a Law degree at the University of British Columbia where she worked with Dr. Natasha Affolder, researching biodiversity and mining. While at UBC Law, Jackie was the Co-Chair of UBC’s Environmental Law Group and co-coordinator of the Public Interest Law Society.



B‘law’g 2: Landmark Victory for the LGTBQ Community in Delhi

29 Jul

Wastepickers aren’t the only community uniting to fight for their rights in India. Indeed, while living in New Delhi for the summer, I am discovering that this is a city rich with activists trying to make India a more equitable and just society. One such group of activists is the LGTBQ community, who recently celebrated a victory for gay rights an India.

Celebrate PRIDE!

Delhi's 2nd Annual Pride Parade

An 8-year public interest challenge to India’s anti-sodomy law was resolved on July 2, 2009 when the Delhi High Court declared the discriminatory aspects of s. 377 of the Indian Penal Code unconstitutional.

Protesting s. 377 of India's Penal Code

Protesting s. 377 of the Indian Penal Code

S. 377 of the Indian Penal Code, first drafted by the British, prohibits intercourse “against the order of nature”. Over the years the Indian judiciary has interpreted this provision as outlawing gay sex in India.  In Naz Foundation (India) Trust v. Government of NCT, Delhi and Others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7455 of 2001, the Delhi High Court held that this discriminatory interpretation of s. 377 violates the equality rights set out in India’s Constitution. Therefore s. 377 was read down to apply only to “non-consensual penile non-vaginal sex and penile non-vaginal sex involving minors” and no longer to consenting adults.

Remembering victims of discrimination

Remembering victims of discrimination and anti-queer violence

I along with two other Chintan interns had the great joy of attending Delhi’s second annual pride parade days before this landmark decision took place. While the Delhi High Court decision is a real victory for the LGTBQ community, many difficulties along the road to equity remain. Regardless of what the law on the books says, discrimination is still experienced in India and challenges to the Delhi High Court decision are already emerging. LGTBQ activists and allies will continue to support one another through their many enduring struggles for equal rights and citizenship in India. 

Sign at Delhi's Pride Parade

Sign at Delhi Pride

For further information on this legal victory see: http://www.lawyerscollective.org/node/1004

Posted By Jackie K. (India)

Posted Jul 29th, 2009

Enter your Comment

Submit

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

 

Fellows

2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003